Spirit In Action

Change IS coming. WE can make it GOOD.

Seven reasons US intervention in Syria is a bad idea – Do no harm – CSMonitor.com

2 Comments

1 of 7

1. Do no harm

The call for intervention is surely trumped, even on humanitarian grounds, by the principle borrowed from medicine: first, do no harm – or, in this case, no greater harm than already done.

THE MONITOR’S VIEW: What Obama must tell Americans about a US strike on Syria

US air strikes on Damascus and Homs, with every risk of civilian casualties, would almost certainly provoke an enraged response by government forces. A conflict whose flames have already fanned into Lebanon, Iraq, and Turkey could well sweep toward Israel (which constitutes the only strategic US interest in the region). An even broader and more perilous ripple effect would be felt if any Russians or Iranians were among the victims of an attack.

David C. Speedie is director of the US Global Engagement program at the Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs.

Next

1 of 7

by Taboola

http://m.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Opinion/2013/0830/Seven-reasons-US-intervention-in-Syria-is-a-bad-idea/Do-no-harm

Author: ohnwentsya

Be the change you wish to see, let's co-create the win-win future we know is possible together!

2 thoughts on “Seven reasons US intervention in Syria is a bad idea – Do no harm – CSMonitor.com

  1. When time permits check out my last post@ Best Moments. I nominated YOU

  2. it is such a complex position — do we help Al Qaeda ? Just blowing up things is certain to harm innocents.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s